This research report is a case study on local peace practices within pastoralist communities in Kenya‚Äôs Turkana North (a subcounty of Kenya‚Äôs Turkana County). While significant existing research and analysis has focused on the concern that pastoralist communities across the African continent may contribute to growing violent conflict‚Äîand in particular to violent extremism‚Äîthis report instead situates these communities within the theoretical framework of ‚Äúeveryday peace.‚Äù This framework centers on understanding the myriad ways in which ordinary people in conflict-affected contexts engage in small acts of peace and forge pro-social relationships that contribute to peace and stability within their communities. This report explores these everyday practices of peace within pastoralist communities in Kenya‚Äôs Turkana County, and Turkana North subcounty, a borderland territory that connects Ethiopia, South Sudan, and Uganda with a long history of conflict around inter-clan livestock raiding and cross-border movement/land access. Informed by a multi-method research methodology that included semi-structured interviews, focus groups, historical profiling, transect walks, and non-participant observational data collected in August 2022, the findings from this study highlight both the existing local systems and resources for peacebuilding and conflict mitigation in pastoralist communities in Turkana, as well as the stressors and challenges that affect them. Lessons from this research contribute to our broader understanding of how policymakers and practitioners can work to better assess and coordinate violence prevention and reduction efforts in light of specific pastoralist needs and everyday practices of peace, particularly in areas impacted by violent conflict and/or violent extremism where pastoralist communities exist.  Suggested citation: Wafula, Caleb Maikuma. Nomadic Pastoralism and Everyday Peace: Key Evidence and Lessons for Peacebuilding and Conflict Mitigation from Kenya‚Äôs Turkana North. Washington, DC: RESOLVE Network, 2024. https://doi.org/10.37805/lpbi2024.2. This publication and research were produced with funding from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)‚Äôs Africa Bureau. RESOLVE would like to thank USAID‚Äôs Africa Bureau for its generous support for this report and RESOLVE‚Äôs Learning from Local Peacebuilding Approaches Research Initiative.The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the RESOLVE Network, acknowledged partners contributing to the production of this publication,the U.S. Institute of Peace, or any entity of the U.S. government.  

This research report is a case study on the relationship between trauma, peacebuilding, and reintegration for conflict-affected youth in the Central African Republic (CAR) following the 2019 peace agreement. Based on qualitative research fielded in Spring 2022, the study examines how youth experience conflict, trauma, and reintegration in CAR, highlighting individual experiences through a participant narrative approach. In doing so, the report provides localized insight into the challenges that impact social reintegration and cohesion in fragile, conflict-affected contexts. The report further underscores the implications of these insights for local and international efforts to establish peace and security through disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) programs and community violence reduction (CVR) initiatives.In addition to standard data collection methods such as interviews and focus group discussions, data collection undertaken for this report utilized a trauma-informed method called body mapping. The use of body maps—life size images of a human body with visual representations of experiences— in research can offer a means for individuals to reflect on potentially difficult experiences through a non-verbal process. Given the potential relevance of this tool in future studies examining the nexus between conflict, reintegration, mental health, and trauma, this report also includes discussion of the implementation of this method with considerations for others hoping to adapt it for their own use.Suggested citation: Zerla, Pauline. Trauma, Violence Prevention, and Reintegration: Learning from Youth Conflict Narratives in the Central African Republic. Washington, DC: RESOLVE Network, 2024. https://doi.org/10.37805/lpbi2024.1.This publication and research were produced with funding from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)’s Africa Bureau. RESOLVE would like to thank USAID’s Africa Bureau for its generous support for this report and RESOLVE’s Learning from Local Peacebuilding Approaches Research Initiative.The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the RESOLVE Network, acknowledged partners contributing to the production of this publication,the U.S. Institute of Peace, or any entity of the U.S. government.

This research was conducted in the context of a Somali state offensive in the Federal Member States of Hirshabelle and Galmudug that generated more territorial gains from al-Shabaab than any other military campaign since the mid-2010s. Such conditions provide fertile ground for disengagement from the insurgents, with many ex-members enrolled into the National Program for the Treatment and Handling of Disengaged Combatants. A core element of this program is its communications pillar, which seeks to promote disengagement through a variety of channels, including radio, television, social media, phone conversations, leaflets, and word-of-mouth. This research aims to inform these campaigns, drawing from interviews conducted in May 2023 with former members of al-Shabaab at the Serendi center in Mogadishu.Suggested citation: Khalil, James, Yahye Abdi, Andrew Glazzard, Abdullahi Ahmed Nor, & Martine Zeuthen. Reaching Behind Frontlines: Promoting Exit from al-Shabaab through Communications Campaigns. Washington, DC: RESOLVE Network, 2023. https://doi.org/10.37805/lpbi2023.2.This publication and research were produced with funding from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)‚Äôs Africa Bureau. RESOLVE would like to thank USAID‚Äôs Africa Bureau for its generous support for this report and RESOLVE‚Äôs Learning from Local Peacebuilding Approaches Research Initiative.The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the RESOLVE Network, acknowledged partners contributing to the production of this publication,the U.S. Institute of Peace, or any entity of the U.S. government. Updated: December 18, 2023

Al-Shabaab has been evicted ‚Äì at least temporarily ‚Äì from scores of towns and villages in the central Somali Federal Member States of Hirshabelle and Galmudug since summer 2022. While this began as an ‚Äòorganic‚Äô uprising led by clan militias (the Ma‚Äôawisley) against the insurgent‚Äôs excessive demands for ‚Äòtaxation‚Äô and recruits, it soon transformed into a major state offensive. Within this context, in May 2023 our team conducted interviews with former members of al-Shabaab who had been based in these locations to explore how and why they left the organization, with a particular focus on the extent to which their decisions to disengage were influenced by the offensive, and how their clans helped motivate and facilitate exit.Suggested citation: Khalil, James, Yahye Abdi, Sif Heide-Ottosen, Abdullahi Ahmed Nor, & Martine Zeuthen. The ‚ÄòOff-Ramp‚Äô from al-Shabaab: Disengagement During the Offensive in Somalia. Washington, DC: RESOLVE Network, 2023. https://doi.org/10.37805/lpbi2023.1.This publication and research were produced with funding from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)‚Äôs Africa Bureau. RESOLVE would like to thank USAID‚Äôs Africa Bureau for its generous support for this report and RESOLVE‚Äôs Learning from Local Peacebuilding Approaches Research Initiative.The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the RESOLVE Network, acknowledged partners contributing to the production of this publication,the U.S. Institute of Peace, or any entity of the U.S. government. Updated: December 18, 2023.